A. Baker, The indispensability argument and multiple foundations for mathematics, The Philosophical Quarterly, vol.53, issue.210, pp.49-67, 2003.

A. Baker, Are there genuine mathematical explanations of physical phenomena? Mind, vol.114, pp.223-224, 2005.

G. Boolos, A curious inference, Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol.16, issue.1, pp.1-12, 1987.

T. Boraud and F. Gonon, Neurosciences, les limites de la méthode, 2013.

K. W. Boyack and R. Klanvans, Including cited non-source items in largescale map of sicence : What difference does it make, Journal of Informetrics, vol.8, pp.569-580, 2014.

R. Samuel and . Buss, On Gödel's theorems on lengths of proofs i: Number of lines and speedup for arithmetics, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol.59, pp.737-756, 1994.

M. Colyvan, The indispensability of mathematics, 2001.

M. Colyvan, There is no easy road to nominalism, Mind, vol.119, issue.474, pp.285-386, 2010.

P. Dehornoy, Another use of set theory. The bulletin of symbolic logic, vol.2, pp.379-391, 1996.

M. Detlefsen and A. Arana, Purity of methods. Philosopher's Imprint, vol.11, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00587851

J. Ketland, Some more curious inferences, Analysis, vol.65, issue.1, pp.18-24, 2005.

P. Maddy, Indispensability and practice, The Journal of Philosophy, vol.89, issue.6, pp.275-289, 1992.

J. Melia, Weaseling away the indispensability argument, Mind, vol.109, issue.435, 2000.

H. Price, Naturalism without representationalism, Naturalism in question, vol.4, pp.71-88, 2004.

S. Walsh, Logicism, interpretability, and knowledge of arithmetic. Review of Symbolic Logic, forthcoming